In her memoir, Hillary Clinton reflects on her acceptance of Barack Obama’s appointment as Secretary of State, emphasizing that, despite the tough campaign and her loss, the electoral process serves to highlight differences—a spirit that energizes Western democracies, particularly American politics.
In these rivalries, theatricality often peaks, with slurs, insults, outrageous claims exchanged, and sometimes assassination attempts like what just happened to Donald Trump . Some politicians even call for the arrest of their opponents. This chaotic display, viewed in the West as a hallmark of democracy, unfolds similarly across Europe.
In contrast, the political landscape in Africa tells a different story. Here, dynamics often escalate dramatically. Incumbents deploy military and police forces, along with state machinery, to suppress opposition. This leads to ruling party supporters feeling empowered to commit acts of violence, while opposition members face threats, beatings, and even fatalities. Protests erupt, with burning tires symbolizing resistance against state brutality, and electoral rigging becomes a foregone conclusion, often ignored by those in power.
However, Rwanda is charting a new course that defies conventional definitions of democracy. As elections approach, weaker political parties often unite, surprising many by endorsing the incumbent for the presidential position while contesting against him for parliamentary seats. This strategic maneuvering is not rooted in any political textbook but stems from a deep-seated fear of reverting to the nation’s devastating past and a genuine appreciation of what Rwanda has achieved in the recent past under the current administration.
Amid this national consensus, a handful of parties opt to field presidential candidates, often in a backdrop of profound unity. The ruling RPF-Inkotanyi, alongside its coalition of eight parties, embarks on an extensive campaign trail, overshadowing underfunded and inexperienced opponents. The coalition’s strength often dwarfs the competition, creating an uneven playing field.
Rwanda’s unique political landscape fosters a sense of shared experience among its citizens, including the opposition. Over the past 30 years, the RPF has driven significant transformations, ensuring that all Rwandans benefit from the nation’s progress. While I won’t delve into the specifics of these changes, I will focus on the electoral process.
When candidates are announced and the electoral calendar is released, the atmosphere becomes electrifying. The state guarantees security for every candidate, and campaign trails proceed peacefully. Observers worldwide are astonished by the absence of insults or name-calling during these campaigns. There are no outbreaks of violence, no burning tires, and no arrests or abductions. Instead, the scenes surrounding President Paul Kagame and his RPF coalition exude unity and celebration.
As Kagame prepares for his rallies, meticulous logistical arrangements are evident. Each event is a grand affair—well-organized, safe, and vibrant, complete with entertainment and refreshments. Supporters travel great distances, some arriving as early as midnight to secure their places. By the time Kagame arrives, the atmosphere is electric, filled with enthusiasm and collective pride.
Campaign speeches resonate deeply, highlighting past achievements and a vision for the future. When Kagame appears, the crowd erupts in joyous celebration, a sight that can be daunting for his rivals, who grapple with the overwhelming support displayed by Kagame’s followers.
Remarkably, there is a sense of camaraderie among all candidates. Regardless of their affiliation, whether aligned with Kagame or in opposition, the focus remains on promises and aspirations rather than divisive rhetoric. Once the show concludes, supporters harmoniously embark on their journeys home, exemplifying a rare political culture.
This phenomenon raises eyebrows globally, leaving political scientists and analysts pondering how a candidate can inspire such fervent loyalty, with thousands willing to forgo meals and endure long travels to show their support. Is it sheer charisma, or is there an underlying fear driving this unity? The Rwandan template poses profound questions about the future of democracy and governance worldwide.
In an age where political landscapes are often fraught with division and discord, Rwanda’s experience offers a compelling narrative that could redefine expectations and inspire leaders globally. Who wouldn’t want to witness such a remarkable transformation? The Rwandan model may serve as a blueprint for a new kind of political engagement.
It is essential to credit the weaker opponents who strive to participate and engage in the competitive political process, as they set a precedent for a peaceful future, even if they may not win elections now. They are exercising their constitutional rights and freedoms. For Rwanda to showcase a mature and peaceful political environment, surpassing even some democracies that are centuries old, is a meaningful example that humanity can still navigate political differences for the greater good.
Therefore, Kagame and the RPF should not be subjected to undue criticism from naysayers questioning Rwandans’ right to make choices that diverge from traditional democratic norms.
As a Rwandan, my analysis is not a defense of Kagame and the RPF, but rather an objective assessment of both insider and outsider perspectives. It is crucial to acknowledge that what occurs elsewhere isn’t inherently bad, but it shouldn’t serve as a prescription for Rwandans. The RPF, led by Kagame, has fostered unity, peace, and development—three vital ingredients for prosperity and human dignity.
Prosperity and human dignity are promises made by every political class. Therefore, if there is a formula to achieve these goals without shedding blood or antagonizing the citizenry and disrupting national cohesion, why not emulate it or adopt certain aspects of it rather than question its legitimacy?
