![](https://taarifa.rw/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/Tariffa-1190x90-1.gif")
The details emerging from the ongoing crisis in the Democratic Republic of Congo (DRC) are as fresh as they are alarming, shedding light on the growing complexities of the situation. As M23 rebels continue to solidify their control over Goma and surrounding territories, the international community is grappling with a conflict that goes beyond local fighting—it has become a geopolitical chessboard, with various foreign powers quietly manipulating events for their own benefit. What started as a regional conflict is now unraveling as a high-stakes game involving resources, military supplies, and hidden international actors.
Recent developments have highlighted the increasingly dire situation. M23, having captured significant military stockpiles from the DRC’s Armed Forces (FARDC), now controls a vast array of advanced weaponry, including anti-tank missiles, RPGs, mortars, and assault rifles. These weapons were previously stored in key military installations and the Goma International Airport. In addition to weaponry, M23 now possesses valuable resources—stolen minerals such as cobalt, coltan, and gold—resources that were illicitly taken with the assistance of FARDC forces and local officials. These minerals, which were once under the control of foreign governments and multinational corporations, are now under M23’s control, amplifying concerns about their future exploitation.
Sources have revealed that negotiations for the recovery of these weapon caches have been taking place through third-party intermediaries. However, these negotiations have taken a bizarre turn, with M23 reportedly dismissing an offer as the “dumbest suggestion.” The offer was intended to facilitate the return of the weapons to the DRC government, but M23’s response shows the extent to which they are leveraging their new military strength to advance their agenda and maintain their control over these valuable resources.
In parallel to these negotiations, there are growing concerns among some foreign governments about the exposure of their role in the ongoing crisis. For years, various countries have profited from the illegal exploitation of DRC’s resources, often through backdoor deals with local militias and government officials. The recent capture of military supplies by M23 has put a spotlight on these clandestine activities, leading some nations to scramble to distance themselves from the fallout. These countries, fearing the potential for exposure, are increasingly looking for scapegoats to divert attention from their own involvement.
In this context, Western media outlets have amplified the narrative that M23 is “backed by Rwanda,” hoping to shift the blame onto Kigali and deflect attention from the deeper, more complex geopolitical dynamics at play. By painting Rwanda as the primary instigator, these media outlets are attempting to create a diversion and generate support for military intervention against M23, all while deflecting scrutiny from their own complicity in the region’s resource extraction and military supply chains.
This strategy is part of a broader effort to salvage the international reputation of these countries, whose involvement in the DRC’s resource exploitation is now at risk of being exposed. By accusing Rwanda of backing M23, they hope to distract the global public from the long-standing partnerships that have enabled illegal mineral extraction and the arming of local militias.
The United Nations Security Council’s extraordinary meeting on the crisis exemplified the lack of concrete action to address the real issues at hand. Member states issued vague statements, calling for M23 to withdraw from occupied territories but avoiding any mention of the illegal arms trade or the role of foreign powers in sustaining the conflict. This tepid response reflects the uncomfortable reality that many of the UN’s key members are deeply entangled in the region’s exploitative practices. Behind closed doors, these nations are worried about the exposure of their dirty dealings—particularly the illegal supply of arms and ammunition to the DRC government, which has long facilitated the extraction of valuable minerals for foreign benefit.
Sources further suggest that some countries have been testing new weapons with the DRC government, using M23 as a testbed for military technologies. Others have provided ammunition in exchange for access to DRC’s minerals. Meanwhile, countries that have historically undermined Rwanda’s efforts in the region have been supporting the DRC government and its allies, including the FDLR (Democratic Forces for the Liberation of Rwanda), further complicating the situation.
This entire operation—concealed behind a façade of media narratives and diplomatic statements—serves to further M23’s objectives while continuing the cycle of exploitation in the DRC. M23, heavily resourced by foreign actors, is not only advancing its military agenda but also capitalizing on the continued looting of the country’s natural resources. This dynamic is leading to a precarious situation where multiple international players are trying to secure their own interests, all while avoiding accountability for their roles in the conflict.
As the situation continues to evolve, it is clear that the real story behind the DRC crisis is one of hidden alliances, military maneuvering, and resource exploitation, with foreign powers scrambling to protect their investments and cover up their involvement. While the world’s attention is fixated on the escalating violence, the true scale of the international complicity in the DRC’s resource extraction and the weapons supply chain is beginning to surface, revealing a complex web of interests and agendas that threaten to further destabilize the region. The global public may never fully know the extent of the dirty hands behind this crisis, but one thing is clear: the true instigators of the conflict are working hard to keep their secrets hidden.
